Van Stone: Trick Question...Why Are Black Peoples Against Blacks Getting Reparations? Germans In America Are Willing To Give Jews Reparations - Krispy Kreme owners plan to donate £8.3m over Nazi family ties

Van Stone: Trick Question...Why Are Black Peoples Against Blacks Getting Reparations? Germans In America Are Willing To Give Jews Reparations - Krispy Kreme owners plan to donate £8.3m over Nazi family ties  

So, Slavery is a crime. Black peoples VS Black peoples don't view Slavery as a crime. The US Gov Constitution says that Slavery is not a crime- well it wasn't a crime until an amendment just so happen to be added to the US Constitution.

Black American peoples are the only ones of race history and ethnicity of peoples history, especially due to periods of war, that other ethnic ties refuse to believe should get reparations. Native American's history, Puerto Rican's History, Japanese's History and Korean's History, even Indian's History -all groups of Black peoples- got some form of reparations regardless whether the reparations were in America or abroad due to war. And most of the groups of peoples who were behind ensuring that Native Americans, Puerto Ricans, Indians, Japanese and Koreans got reparations were White.     

The Trick question is... what is it about some White Peoples and some Black Peoples that they are against Black Americans getting reparations? Anyway, below is a most recent news story about reparations.  

The family that owns brands such as Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Panera Bread, Pret a Manger and Keurig Dr Pepper has found family ties to Nazi ancestors.

The findings were part of a three-year investigation which uncovered the family’s use of slave labor during World War II.

According to the investigation, Albert Reimann Sr and Albert Reimann Jr used Russian and French prisoners of war as forced labour in their factories.

The Reimann businessmen were also openly anti-Semitic and supporters of Adolf Hitler, with the investigation finding a letter from Reimann Jr to a local mayor in which he complained that the French prisoners employed at his factory were not working hard enough and should be in prison, Deutsche Welle reports.

Findings from as early as 1931 show the family made donations to the SS, the military organization under Hitler.

Reimann Sr passed away in 1954 and Reimann Jr passed away in 1984.

In a statement to German newspaper Bild am Sonntag, Reimann family spokesperson Peter Harf said the two deceased Reimann relatives were “guilty” and “actually belonged in prison”.

“We were ashamed and white as sheets. There is nothing to gloss over,” he added. “These crimes are disgusting.”

According to Harf, the elder Reimanns did not speak of their past anti-Semitic ties before they died, but family heirlooms prompted younger members of the family to commission a historian from the University of Munich to look into their past more closely.

Following the investigation, the Reimann family, which owns the majority of JAB Holding Company and which is reportedly one of the richest families in Germany, will donate $11m (£8.3m) to an undisclosed charity on behalf of the crimes of their ancestors.

The family also plans to make the findings public once the investigation has been completed.

The Independent has contacted JAB Holdings for comment.

Van Stone: John Hanson- Black-On-Black Slavery, First Black Continental Congress, President, And The Revolutionary War All Together Equals Today And Reparations

Van Stone: John Hanson- Black-On-Black Slavery, First Black Continental Congress, President, And The Revolutionary War All Together Equals Today And Reparations 

So, many, many, men and women have challenged the US Gov. about Reparations and have ended up either forgotten or worse- enchained. For example: There’s a statue of George Washington somewhere, with four slaves enchained. No wait, that’s Louis XIV and his Colonial Ordinance of 1685, best known as the “Black Code,” had remained in force in French law for 163 years, not the George Washington, the President who never told a lie.

You see, French involvement in the American Revolutionary War began in 1775, when France, a rival of the British Empire, secretly shipped supplies to the Continental Army. ... France's help is considered a major, vital, and decisive contribution to the United States' victory against the British. Blacks were fighting enslaved for both the Americans and the French becoming even more of a major, vital, and decisive contribution to the United States’ victory against the British. But with what results? The American Continental Congress created the same colonial ordinance for Blacks that the French Monarch had long created for Blacks- continued Slavery. This type of Slavery by both the French and America leads right back to the main discovery…Black-on-Black Slavery.

Both France and the 13 colonies recognized Black leadership but only where there was Black rule in parts of North Africa- Morocco in times of war. At times, France had its French embassy in Morocco working very closely with Blacks long before leading up to the Revolutionary War. The 13 colonies had no embassy in Morocco during the Revolutionary War. This was because the 13 colonies were governing independently although operating under the Charter of British law. Therefore, it was far easier for Black-on-Black Slavery to happen in both the French colonies and the 13 Colonies than almost anywhere else in the world.

Just because it was far easier for Black-on-Black Slavery to happen in certain parts of the world doesn’t allow this fact to be an excuse for any Black person to choose to help themselves during Slavery by helping a White person to enslave Blacks. Nevertheless, people who were slaves were identified as either Indentured-servitude folk or the just plain Black Slave. And because of the Black Code by France’s Louis XIV, the longest ruling governing power in the history of Europe, was used as a template on how to conduct Slavery throughout the Americas, Blacks with ancestry from the Atlantic Slave process could indeed become free blacks, get Christian Civilization Education, and then in turn behave as if Slavery never had anything to do with the race that they are.

And so then, now we come to the other good part about the discovery that, possibility there actually was a First Black Continental Congress, President. But how? At least 343 men attended the Continental Congress. Period. George Washington, the future President of the US, racist and White supremacist, was in attendance. Everyone understanding US Gov and American History knows that George Washington was a racist and a White supremacist. Fact.

It’s a good thing that not all of the 343 were racist and White supremacist. Because of this fact too, the 13 colonies were at constant battle with one another. On the one side, not necessarily the South, men gave Catholic leaders the oaths of supremacy and allegiance to the royal charter of Slavery, campaigned aggressively against separate colonizing, be White men and White women who enforced religious conformity in their settlements, and operate heavily plantation-based territory. And on the other side, not necessarily the North, White men and White women spoke out for Catholic rule in the colonies to be eventually nullified (this would also include the Pilgrim and Puritan rule, etc.) by the re-assertion of royal control over the colony, envisioned a colony where people of different religious sects and races would coexist under the principle of toleration- ending Slavery therein the Americas, and operate English rule not British rule and the right to freedom of religion and race for all citizens in the new United States.

Remember this… British rule was White peoples for the Catholic Religious Order (for Slavery)- Scottish, German and Irish, etc. English rule was White peoples for the Protestant Religious Order (for Self-Identity) England, Morocco (Morocco captured and enslaved White peoples meanwhile granting the White race enchained freedom upon their conversion to Islam. This type of slavery wasn’t the same as the Atlantic Slave Trade), etc.

From the moment of being identified as the Black race during the Atlantic Slave Trade and Slavery there was never any intentions of freedom for the Black race.

Regardless of all the racism and bigotry ruling as the status quo within most of the 13 colonies, still one of the 343 at the Continental Congress was a Black man. Rumor has it that there were at least 2 Black men that had attended the Continental Congress.

Today, both groups of Black peoples and groups of White peoples want conclusive information about at least one of the Black men that had attended the Continental Congress- his name… John Hanson.

But why say John Hanson and not say, John Adams? There has been no rumor thus far that John Adams, President, was Black. There has long been rumor after rumor and debate after debate that John Hanson of the Revolutionary War was in fact, Black.

John Hanson came from a family line of indentured servitude. After all of the reading above about indentured servitude, every person, both White and Black, who is not a racist or a supremacist, understands that indentured servitude and Slave during the Revolutionary War Period are the group of Black peoples, -the dark-skinned, the Black-skinned, the Brown-skinned, the Red-skinned, the Yellow-skinned, and more importantly for this discovery about the First Black President, the Mulatto-skinned,- that includes a lot of interchangeable faces.

Today, racist and White supremacist twist facts and deny truths, and even re-write history to support their own agenda.

It is very clear to anyone studying the way things were done during the Revolutionary War Period that it would be most likely almost impossible for one Black man, let alone two Black men, to have been able to be in Continental Congress attendance, in a room that has over 300 White peoples in it, without objections- violent objections. And the Black man, during war time, is President of a new royal Order name-called, for Free White Peoples? Yet, almost impossible actually sometimes does become- possible. For real though.

Some argue that John Hanson, a Black man, was the President who presided over congress, under the new royal Order, for Free White Peoples, under the Article of Confederation – the Continental Congress of the United States because from 1781 to 1782 he was "President of the United States in Congress Assembled" under the Articles of Confederation.

Some argue that John Hanson was White. Arguing that John Hanson was White kills the First Black President theory. So, which one is it? Answer is… John Hanson was indeed Black just as rumor would have it.

Now that so many people, both Black and White, have been convinced that there was a first Black American President and that this Black person was in power before George Washington was, Americans need to embrace themselves for more facts, especially Black Americans, that John Hanson, the Black Founding Father was a FRAUD. In fact, John Hanson was a fraud just like Frederick Douglas, a Black man, former slave, was also a fraud. The discovery about Frederick Douglas, former slave, is for another day.

As for John Hanson… he was a fraud because he just so happens to be a Black person voluntarily becoming president of the Continental Congress before the actual finalization of the United States Gov. happened. John Hanson experienced firsthand the Trans-Atlantic-Slave Trade, Colony racism and White Supremacy, battle against the British, and the evil that is to never pay a person just because of the color of their skin.

How could he do that? And in addition, John Hanson owned slaves just like his contemporary George Washington did.

Anyone who was Black or White -fighting then against racism and White Supremacy during the time of the Revolutionary War- knew full well that there were Blacks participating in the capture and selling of other groups of Black peoples. Most Blacks identified by groups of White peoples, as Black, Blacks making money off of the Atlantic Slave Trade business, lived outside of the Americas.

Yet here was a Black person, not only 100 percent in agreement with enslaving groups of Black peoples, but fighting against the British for so-called freedoms of White peoples during the Revolutionary War IDENTIFIED BY WHITE PEOPLES AS- A WHITE MAN.

Notice the image of John Hanson here? The image appears to be a drawing or painting of a White man. Yes, that is him, John Hanson.

Remember, I have explained many, many, times before that the Black race is an ethnic group identified by the being dark-skinned- meaning Black-skinned, Brown-skinned, Red-skinned, Yellow-skinned, Mulatto-skinned, etc. And what’s so important about race identification or self-identify is that this really depends on what one race identifies the other race as.

Since there are only 2 races of people in the whole wide-world of race, groups of White peoples during the Revolutionary War identified a mulatto-skinned individual not as Black person but rather as a White person.

John Hanson, the man in the image, John Hanson looks White, not because of the style of drawing or painting during the Revolutionary War period, but rather because George Washington and friends of that time identified John Hanson as White instead of identifying Hanson as Black. And this John Hanson accepted the identity the racist and White supremacist preferred him to be.

Don’t try to rely on drawings or even paintings of the Revolutionary War times for identification because there are painting of people then and many of the images don’t even come close to what the actual person looked like.

Discovering ancestry helps to identify the who’s who of famous people during the Revolutionary War Period. Since a Mulatto individual is a person of mixed white and black ancestry, especially a person with one white and one black parent, John Hanson was Black- this John Hanson knew and now today, WE all know.

Becoming president, involving the US Gov of the past or present, in any capacity has never guaranteed any honesty, freedom, rights and most importantly self-identity for any group of peoples regardless of race, ethnicity or ancestry. The US congress was established for the sole purpose to control the independent states and way of life in the Americas. How things were done in the past equals Reparations- Reparations that has never been paid to Black Americans.